Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brandon's avatar

Agree on practically every point written in this article. Also important to note that the ‘20 team’s greatest team strength (transition defense) wouldn’t necessarily matchup to the ‘22 team’s offensively versatility. Conversely, we know one defensive issue the ‘22 team has was sticking to the PNR ball handler (Nova/Remy PTSD…), but that might not be exposed since that wasn’t a strength of the ‘20 team.

Ultimately, my thought (and I’ve thought way more than I should have) is it comes down to a couple of key matchups and “glue guys”, namely Minaya/Diallo and Khalif/Horchler. Horchler was an unsung piece of how the offense ran with his size and range, regardless of whether he shot well, and Khalif would’ve been an ideal guy to defend him. Similarly, Diallo was that guy…and when he was frustrated or off, it usually meant a tough night for that offense. It wouldn’t be easy but Minaya was just so consistently good at defending players like Diallo that I’d give him the edge.

At the end of the day it’s still close - since Pip and AJ that year were the epitome of a microwave and could take over. It might play out like the Kansas game with Minaya taking out Diallo but Pip playing the role of Remy Martin. But I still think ‘22’s offensive depth, cohesion and “it” factor win in the end…because that’s just what they do.

Great read, as always! Go Friars.

No posts

Ready for more?